First Reading: Judges, Part 4 - Chapter 14
![]() |
| "The Wedding of Samson" painted by Rembrandt, 1638 I love this painting. The look on the bride's face tells it all. |
Welcome to Part 4 of my First Reading of the Book of Judges. This post will discuss chapter 14, which covers the early adulthood and marriage of Samson. It is absolutely packed with symbolism and allusions and deeper meanings. I had so many thoughts to share with you from this chapter. In fact, I wish my husband were face-to-face with you because he would laugh and tell you how excited and animated I get when I’m talking about Samson and this story. Chapter 14 is just stuffed with figurative layers on top of the plot, and even though most of it won't be obvious on the surface to us, we have to remember that all of it would have been perfectly plain to the Hebrews of Ancient Israel.
This chapter is so full of loaded references that I actually imagined contemporary readers turning to one
another with exasperated faces saying something like, “Wow, he’s laying it on a bit thick, don’t you
think,” but for us, it's not quite so easy. You and I will have to work through these metaphors and images a little bit to
get at the meanings, but once you see them, it's really cool.
Previously, in Judges
Samson is born after a divine annunciation to his mother
from an angel of the Lord. He is
dedicated as a Nazirite (see Numbers 6 for details) from before his conception
in order to keep him holy (set apart) for God.
This man was born with one purpose:
to deliver Israel from the Philistines.
Chapter 14 – Samson’s
Character is Revealed
This chapter is packed with points of illumination on who
Samson is. We learned in chapter 13 who
this man was supposed to be for God,
and in chapter 14, we learn who he actually became.
In the very first verse, we see Samson lust after a woman
and then go to his parents with this little nugget:
“When he returned home, he told his father, ‘A young
Philistine woman in Timnah caught my eye.
I want to marry her. Get her for
me.’” – Judges 14:2.
1.) Samson sees a pretty girl, and based upon his initial
physical attraction, he determines to marry her.
2.) This girl is a Philistine, but Samson registers no
caution on that front. Remember that
Samson is a Nazirite for life, and above all that means keeping himself
ceremonially clean and holy/set apart for service to God. Marrying a Philistine, a pagan worshiper of
false gods and idols, was unwise in the extreme, not to mention a direct
violation of Mosaic Law.
It is important as Western and 21st century
people that we don’t get confused here. The
laws against intermarriage weren’t about race or racial purity or even
obsessions with bloodline. We can know that
they weren’t because there are a lot of examples to turn to. Moses had two wives during his life (one at a
time), and they were each of a different nation and race. When Moses’ brother and sister complain about
his new 2nd wife (who was Ethiopian/Cushite), God punishes the siblings
severely for it. He straight gives the
sister (Miriam) a flaming case of leprosy until she repents! Further, throughout the Old Testament, we see
people marrying across nation/tribe lines with general approval. So the law against intermarriage isn’t about Samson’s
pretty woman being a Philistine or an ethnic
“other.” This is about her being a follower
of idolatrous worship, a religious
“other,” which in case we missed it between Genesis and Judges chapter 11 is
the number one cause of Israel’s distress
and destruction.
God tolerates just about everything, but the hammer comes
down on idolatry…over and over and
over again. It’s what the whole book of
Judges is about, after all! Samson’s
mother tries to reason with her son over this to no avail.
3.) Samson’s language to his father indicates a toxic sense
of entitlement on Samson’s part. He sees
this Philistine woman and wants her, so he feels entitled to own her. Let that percolate for a few seconds. We’ve met people like Samson, haven’t
we? They want it so the world owes it to
them. “Get her for me, Dad. I want her.”
Just wow.
Samson sees this
woman. He doesn’t talk to her. He doesn’t meet with her father or ask around
about her family. He doesn’t bring her a
gift or perform any kind of gallant service for her like previous courting
we’ve seen in the Old Testament. He
doesn’t look to see if her people are idolaters or express a curiosity about her
moral character. When we read about the
way Isaac and Rebekah marry in Genesis 24 or the way Jacob courts Rachel in
Genesis 29, we see a huge and stark contrast in the behavior and the image of
how decent, well-mannered people put a marriage together from this ancient
culture.
Seeing this difference, we can know (even through the veil
of modern Western eyes) that Samson’s reactions and his expectations and his
behavior are not normal or respectful or even decent. Samson wants what he wants, and he believes
he is owed “whatever is right in his own eyes.”
We Do Our Children No
Favors By SPOILING Them
As I was reading this, I made the sort of side joke to my
husband that “Samson’s mother must have just spoiled him rotten,” but I have to
wonder if that’s more accurate than we know.
This is not from the text, but I was just really struck by it
pretty hard while reading Samson’s story.
It makes sense.
Amy’s Wild Speculation:
Samson’s parents were wealthy and somewhat influential;
that’s made very clear in the story.
They couldn’t conceive for a long time, and when they finally do get to
have a baby together, it is a boy, an heir. He is announced with fire and fanfare by an
angel of the Lord. He is special. He is dedicated to God and blessed by God
before he even leaves the womb. He is
going to rescue their people. He is
going to be—omg, wait for it—a savior.
Don’t think for a second that I’m reading too much into
this. I might get it wrong sometimes,
but these similarities and these structural parallels and then the stark
contrasts are all in here for a reason.
Nothing in the Bible is an accident, and you don’t get a story that
mirrors the messianic story by accident…not ever. They are usually there to either foreshadow
Christ or show a fallen contrast to Christ (which is what I believe this one
is), but they crop up all over the place.
When they do, you have to look at it because it’s always important.
How cool is the Bible? Man alive, I love studying this book.
Okay, so now…imagine you’re Manoah or his wife raising this unbelievably miraculous baby. This kid is your golden boy! You prayed for him. God sent an actual angel down from actual Heaven to answer your prayers. He told you that your long-awaited child is going to save Israel. Do you think maybe you could fall into the trap of just absolutely ruining the boy’s disposition with overindulgence? With overpraise? With overestimation of what he deserves?
I think I could fall into that trap, and I very much wonder
if Samson’s parents did. I would have
loved to be a fly on that wall.
At any rate, the contrast between the expectation of Samson
in chapter 13 and the reality of Samson in chapter 14 is shocking, and I
believe that was intentional. We’re
supposed to be thinking here that something has gone terribly wrong with this
boy who was blessed by God and stirred by the Spirit.
Instead of being holy, he is worldly. Instead of being self-sacrificing, he is
hedonistic. Instead of being humble, he
is proud. The author wants to make sure
we know all of that about Samson by verse 2!
Not good.
And it’s gonna get worse.
![]() |
| 19th century unattributed etching, Samson & the Lion |
Samson Violates His
Nazirite Vows with the Lion & Honey
Samson kills a lion on his way to meet with the Philistine
woman (now his fiancée). It’s
interesting because it says he was travelling to see her with his parents, but
he clearly walked away from them or took
a different path than they did because his mother and father are not
witness to his killing of the lion. The
Spirit of the Lord came “powerfully upon him” when the lion attacked. Samson has a destiny. God wasn’t going to allow him to be killed by
a beast. Still. If he’d just stayed on the path set forth for
him by his parents, he never woulda had ta’ kill a flippin’ lion with his bare
hands to keep from getting dead. /wise
nod.
Now the really important thing I noticed comes next. When they come back for the wedding some time
later, Samson takes this same road again and stops to see the lion’s carcass. Dead animals are unclean. Mosaic Law (and basic common sense) makes
this clear. For Nazirites, this is even
more important. “They must not go near a
dead body…even if the dead person is their own father, mother, brother, or
sister, they must not defile themselves.” (Num 6:6-7) Nazirites are supposed to be so clean and so
separated from unclean things that they don’t even go near a dead human body, much less touch one (the
normal rule). Not even for a funeral. Every Israelite was to avoid touching dead
animals, and Nazirites are even further restricted. So this is a violation of his vows beyond the
pale when he revisits the dead lion.
In fairness, if I was just going along and living my life
and one day out of the blue, God put a superpower on me so strong that I could
catch and tear apart an angry lion with my bare hands, I might have gotten a
bit obsessed with it, as well. It is
understandable that Samson might want to go back to the dead lion. Did he dream it? Did that crazy thing really happen? It makes sense. But it’s still a rebellious sin.
So Samson waltzes through a vineyard to seek out this dead lion. Nazirites are not to eat or drink anything made from grapes or consume any kind of alcohol. So here Samson is, surrounded by grapes, purposefully examining the dead body of a lion. It is a striking picture, an overwhelming picture, of the direct violation of his vows. So what does this man do next? Well, naturally, he scoops some honey up out
of the carcass and eats it. Honey is also very symbolic in the Old
Testament and is forbidden in sacrifices to the Lord. I’m absolutely certain this is important,
that it makes what Samson has done here even worse, but I will have to consult
with theology books on this before I can really go further in understanding it. It ties in deeply with Leviticus and honey
being ritualistically related to blood, but all you need to know for now is:
-Nazirites are supposed to be living sacrifices to God while they are under their time of vows.
-Nazirites are supposed to be living sacrifices to God while they are under their time of vows.
-Nazirites are never to go anywhere near a dead body.
-Honey is forbidden in sacrifices to the Lord.
-Eating honey out of a dead carcass is just about the last
thing on earth a Nazirite should ever do.
Suffice it to say, this was really, really disobedient and
unholy and unclean, but to make matters even worse—the author is really banging
this symbolism home—Samson takes this unholy honey to his parents and, like Eve
in the Garden, encourages them to eat it also.
Like the serpent, he deceives
them because they have no idea that this honey is unclean and like Eve, he encourages them to partake in
his own rebellious sin.
It’s that deep, y’all.
Go back and read this first half of chapter 14 again if it’s been a
while for you. This incident with the
lion carcass and the honey is huge, Huge, HUGE.
I don’t understand all of it, but I know that much. Big, big deal. This is serious blasphemy going on as they travel down for Samson’s wedding.
The Lord Was at Work
in This
I love verse 14:4 because it gives the reader permission to
exhale and believe that all of this is going to be okay in the end. God’s got this. It reads:
“His father and mother didn’t realize the Lord was at work in this, creating an opportunity to work against the Philistines, who ruled over Israel at that time.”
And that is the main point.
However this happened, whether it was parental failure or
just really bad choices made by Samson, the people in this story mess
everything up. God’s plan, however, is
going to get executed. Whatever the ideal plan may have looked like, Samson’s
behavior and character led them all to this point, and God’s solution was to
put a Philistine woman in Samson’s path to nudge events from there.
![]() |
| I thought a map might be helpful. You can see Timnah, the town where Samson married and Zorah, where his family lived. map image from Ferrell's Travel Blog. |
Amy’s Wild Speculation #2:
Samson was born into the perfect family from which to exert
political influence. He was dedicated as
a Nazirite to demonstrate God’s glory to any Philistine who met him. That is a powerful combination. Wealth, influence, and all of the spiritual
gifts necessary to demonstrate the glory of the one true and living God of
Israel to their enemies were his. All of
that tied up in one man at the perfect time.
I mean, wow. It could have been
just take-your-breath-out magnificent. Through
his rebellion and sin, however, Samson shut down the gateway to any diplomatic dissolution
of Philistine oppression, so God flips the switch and uses Samson to start a
war, instead. More than one way to peel
an orange, I guess.
Now, keep in mind that these are just thoughts I’m having as
I read and reflect on this story. There
is no textual evidence that God had a “better plan” to do any of this
differently, but I think it’s pretty clear that God’s intention for Samson was
not vow breaking and lust and visceral rages at innocent people. God hasn’t ever worked like that in the Old
Testament before so, I wondered about what God’s original plan for Samson—the
good way, the easy way, the godly way—to deliver Israel from Philistine
oppression might have looked like. If
Samson had been a good man, a holy man, and lived up to the destiny that was
set up for him in Judges 13, then what would his story have looked like?
And I thought of Joseph in Egypt. Diplomacy.
Daniel with Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon.
Diplomacy. Samson was wealthy and
impressive. Is it odd to think that God
might have wanted to use Samson with the Philistines the way he used Joseph with
the Egyptians and Daniel with the Babylonians?
We can’t know. The Bible doesn’t
tell us, but these are the thoughts I had.
Pride Goeth Before
the Fall
So the family descends on the town and Samson is
married. Immediately, Samson begins to
assimilate and follow Philistine customs.
Verses 10 and 11 tell us that elite Philistine grooms have a custom of
getting a large group of other elite men together for a seven-day party after
weddings. The bride’s parents choose
thirty Philistine men to be Samson’s “companions” at this party. Samson is not behaving as an Israelite. He is not socializing with Israelites. He is not following or demonstrating
Israelite customs and religious practice to the Philistines in his new
family. He is not exerting his influence
on the pagans. He is allowing the pagans
to influence him.
And we all know how well that turns out.
Still unable to stop obsessing about having killed the lion
with his bare hands, Samson’s wonderment or amazement has turned into
pride. He is very
self-congratulatory. He thinks he is
just the best thing since sliced bread, and at this decadent party filled with
Philistine strangers, he sets a riddle before his guests. He knows they will never guess the story of
the lion and the honey, so his intention is to bilk them out of the goods they
wagered over the riddle and then amaze them all with his self-aggrandizing tale
of superhuman strength.
The men from this party don’t want to lose face in a bet
with this Israelite stranger, so they bully his wife, even threatening to kill
her family in order to get the answer to Samson’s riddle from her. In fear, she goes to Samson weeping. She asks for the answer, but he refuses to
give it to her. The bullies get even
more hostile so she “torments” Samson with her “nagging” until he gives her the
answer. Naturally, she passes the lion
and honey answer to the men, causing Samson to lose the wager and, more
importantly, the shock and awe he was so eager to deliver in front of the whole
party in triumph at the end of the seven days.
Instead of taking pity on his new bride or asking why she
would have done such a thing, our self-satisfied Samson flies off into a blind
rage (which will become a pattern with him).
-He went to another town and murdered thirty innocent
men. One can only assume these were
proxy killings because he wanted to kill the thirty men from the party.
-He steals the goods and clothing from his murder victims to
pay the wager to his party companions.
-Then he skips town to go back home to his parents, publicly
abandoning his wife so thoroughly that her family believes she has been
functionally divorced/rejected.
The bride’s father gives her in marriage to the man who was
Samson’s best man at the wedding, and they all go on with life, assuming that
the whole unpleasant mess is over.
Side Note/Question: On that last point, I will have
to look up to see if that was some kind of Philistine custom. The Israelites, for example, would have a man
marry his brother’s widow if the brother died without heirs, and this was a
sacred duty in their family codes of honor.
The verse is so specific about the best man from the wedding taking
Samson’s jilted wife that it makes me wonder if there’s a cultural custom of
the Philistines in there somewhere.
Closing out Chapter
14
I think the major goal of chapter 14 is to show us that
Samson rejected the gifts of his birth.
He was set up for every kind of material and spiritual success, but even
with every imaginable advantage, Samson chose sin and rebellion and violence. He followed his own desires and cared nothing
for the needs of other people, for the honor of his parents, or for his vows to
God.
God had an original plan for Samson, and we can only
speculate about the particulars, but we know from chapter 13 that it was
special and holy and good. Samson rejected God’s plan, and it leads to
his death and destruction. God’s will
gets done. God is God, and what he
speaks will be. We can get on board and
enjoy the blessings or we can get in the way and be steamrolled.
I’ll come back tomorrow and we’ll jump right back in at
chapter 15.







Comments
Post a Comment